Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
North Carolina Amendment 1 (often referred to as simply Amendment 1) is a partially overturned legislatively referred constitutional amendment in North Carolina that (until overruled in federal court) amended the Constitution of North Carolina to add ARTICLE XIV, Section 6, which prohibit the state from recognizing or performing same-sex ...
Amendments must be properly proposed and ratified before becoming operative. This process was designed to strike a balance between the excesses of constant change and inflexibility. [1] An amendment may be proposed and sent to the states for ratification by either:
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents Congress from making laws respecting an establishment of religion; prohibiting the free exercise of religion; or abridging the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
With 65.26% of the votes counted across the state, Amendment 1 has passed with a 61.4% approval rate. The Associated Press called the results of the ballot measure just before 9 p.m., Tuesday night.
A proposed amendment may be adopted and sent to the states for ratification by either: The United States Congress, whenever a two-thirds majority in both the Senate and the House deem it necessary; or. A national convention, called by Congress for this purpose, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds (presently 34) of the states ...
The First and 27th amendments had very different paths. ... seven months later by a vote of Michigan in May 1992. So, 10 Amendments were ratified in two years, and one in 202 years. Patience is ...
Louisiana Constitutional Amendment No. 1 is passed. On election ballots in Louisiana, proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 1 read, ...
The Supreme Court has largely interpreted the Petition Clause as coextensive with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, but in its 2010 decision in Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2010) it acknowledged that there may be differences between the two: This case arises under the Petition Clause, not the Speech Clause.