Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Verbalized explicit processes or attitudes and actions may change with persuasion or education; though implicit process or attitudes usually take a long amount of time to change with the forming of new habits. Dual process theories can be found in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. It has also been linked with economics ...
She emphasized that implicit knowledge underpins fluent communication, while explicit knowledge plays a secondary, monitoring role. Rod Ellis significantly advanced the study of implicit and explicit knowledge in SLA through a systematic psychometric approach aimed at operationalizing and validating these constructs. Ellis emphasized the ...
Terrains affect the process of changing tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge. Terrains are of three kinds: Relational tacit knowledge: Relational tacit knowledge could be made explicit, but not made explicit for reasons that touch on deep principles that have to do with either the nature or location of knowledge of the way humans are made ...
Implicit bias is the subliminal prejudice that can lead to racism. “Many people use the terms ‘prejudice’ and ‘racism’ interchangeably, but this is inaccurate,” explains Tatum.
This training, based on the ultimate attribution error, reduces implicit prejudice by getting people to focus on situational explanations for negative behaviors displayed by members of stigmatized groups. Again, it is unclear if this leads to a decrease in conscious prejudiced attitudes. Thought process reconditioning. Some research suggests ...
One example of how explicit and implicit memory works together is driving a car. “At once, we must remember the directions (explicit) of where we are headed while also remembering how to drive ...
A 2020 meta-analysis by Banas, et al., included 79 cases and concluded that “positive mediated contact decreased [prejudice] (r = −.23; 95% CI, −.29 to −.17), whereas negative mediated contact increased prejudicial attitudes (r = .31; 95% CI, .24 to .38).” [25] When comparing parasocial and vicarious contact, the meta-analysis found ...
An example of this is that people can hold implicit prejudicial attitudes, but express explicit attitudes that report little prejudice. Implicit measures help account for these situations and look at attitudes that a person may not be aware of or want to show. [21] Implicit measures therefore usually rely on an indirect measure of attitude.