Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Spokeo utilizes deep web crawlers to aggregate data. [9] Searches can be made for a name, email, phone number, username or address. The site allows users to remove information about themselves through an "opt-out" process that requires the URL of the listing and a valid email address. [10]
Unfortunately, even legitimate URLs can be spoofed using non-Roman characters that look right to human eyes but are actually grabbed from other languages (a so-called punycode attack).
PeopleFinders is a people search company, providing individuals with various types of public records that will allow them to obtain contact information for most private citizens in the United States.
Data brokers in the United States include Acxiom, Experian, Epsilon, CoreLogic, Datalogix, Intelius, PeekYou, Exactis, and Recorded Future. [21] [22] In 2012, Acxiom claimed to have files on about 500 million active consumers worldwide, with about 1,500 data points per person [23] and, in 2023, Acxiom (renamed LiveRamp) claims to have files on 2.5 billion people and over 3,000 data points per ...
BeenVerified is a background check company that provides consumer initiated criminal background and people search services through its website for profit as well as its mobile application "Background Check App." [4] [5] The company also launched additional mobile applications including a reverse number look up called NumberGuru [6] and a registered sex offender tracking app that uses augmented ...
PeekYou is a people search engine that indexes people and their links on the web. Founded in April 2006 by Michael Hussey, PeekYou claims that they have indexed over 250 million people, mostly in the United States and Canada.
Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]
For those reasons, Facebook's critics fear that social networking companies may seek business ventures with stockholders by sharing user information in the exchange of profits. Additionally, they argue that since Facebook demonstrates an illusion of privacy presented by a “for-friends-only” type of platform, individuals find themselves more ...