enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Minnesota v. Olson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_v._Olson

    Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990), is a landmark search and seizure case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.In a 7–2 decision, the court held that a person staying as a guest in the house of another had a legal expectation of privacy, and that a warrantless entry into that house to arrest the person tainted the arrest and the individual's subsequent statements.

  3. Birchfield v. North Dakota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birchfield_v._North_Dakota

    Birchfield was a consolidation of three cases: Birchfield v.North Dakota, Bernard v.Minnesota, and Beylund v.Levi.Birchfield was charged with violation of a North Dakota statute for refusing to submit to blood alcohol content testing; Bernard was charged with a violation of a Minnesota statute for refusing to submit to breath alcohol testing; Beylund underwent a blood alcohol test consistent ...

  4. Minnesota v. Dickerson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_v._Dickerson

    Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States.The Court unanimously held that, when a police officer who is conducting a lawful patdown search for weapons feels something that plainly is contraband, the object may be seized even though it is not a weapon.

  5. How do police get search warrants? Here's what you should know

    www.aol.com/news/police-search-warrants-heres...

    Getting a search warrant begins in a police department and ends with a specific, restricted list of items allowed to be seized on a specific property.

  6. United States v. Knights (2001) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Knights...

    United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 10, 2001. The court held that the police search of a probationer supported by reasonable suspicion and pursuant to a probation condition satisfied the requirements under the Fourth Amendment.

  7. Minnehaha tackles backlog of warrants, court cases with ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/minnehaha-tackles-backlog-warrants...

    The program let people with outstanding warrants for low-level crimes settle their warrants with the sheriff’s department after-hours at the courthouse and talk with state’s attorneys, public ...

  8. United States v. Grubbs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Grubbs

    United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the constitutionality of "anticipatory" search warrants under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that such warrants, which are issued in advance of a "triggering condition" that makes them ...

  9. Roseau, Minnesota, man appears in court for drug and violent ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/roseau-minnesota-man...

    Aug. 14—ROSEAU, Minn. — A Roseau, Minnesota, man charged with multiple drug and violent crimes had his initial appearance in court on Monday, Aug. 14. Brandon Tyrone Hamilton, 33, had a ...