Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[note 1] These sections are considered vital elements of the constitution, which was developed between 1949 by the Constituent Assembly of India. The Fundamental Rights are defined in Part III of the Indian Constitution from article 12 to 35 and applied irrespective of race, birth place, religion, caste , creed, sex, gender, and equality of ...
28 September 2023 (106th) Citation: Constitution of India (PDF), 9 September 2020, archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2020: Location: Samvidhan Sadan, New Delhi, India: Signatories: 284 members of the Constituent Assembly: Supersedes: Government of India Act 1935 Indian Independence Act 1947
The words sovereignty and integrity are the qualities to be cultivated/emulated by Indian people as urged by the Constitution but not used related to the territory of India. Article 1 of Part 1 of the Indian constitution, defines India (Bharat) as a Union of states. In a nutshell, India "is its people, not its land", as enshrined in the ...
Part XXII is a compilation of laws pertaining to the constitution of India as a country and the union of states that it is made of. This part of the constitution contains Articles on short title, date of commencement, Authoritative text in Hindi and Repeals. [1]
The Eighty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India, provides Right to Education for the age of six to fourteen years and Early childhood care until the age of six.It has inserted Article 21A [1] (Right to Education as a Fundamental Right) & replaces Article 45 (Early Childhood Education) of Directive principles of State policy and amended Article 51A (Fundamental Duties) to add new duty ...
To secure the constitutional validity of acquisition of Estates and place land acquisition laws in Schedule 9 of the constitution. 18th: Amend article 3. [24] 27 August 1966 Technical Amendment to include Union Territories in Article 3 and hence permit reorganisation of Union Territories. Lal Bahadur Shastri: 19th: Amend article 324. [25] 11 ...
Essentially, the Bench read Articles 14 and 19 into Article 21. [31] While deciding the Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978), a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that the despite the lack of the Due Process Clause in the Constitution of India same consequence ensued after the decisions in R.C. Cooper v.
Article 392 of the Indian Constitution grants the President of India the authority to remove difficulties that may arise in implementing the provisions of the Constitution. This provision acts as a mechanism to address any practical challenges or obstacles that may hinder the effective implementation of constitutional provisions.