Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The unit circle can be specified as the level curve f(x, y) = 1 of the function f(x, y) = x 2 + y 2.Around point A, y can be expressed as a function y(x).In this example this function can be written explicitly as () =; in many cases no such explicit expression exists, but one can still refer to the implicit function y(x).
An implicit function is a function that is defined by an implicit equation, that relates one of the variables, considered as the value of the function, with the others considered as the arguments. [ 1 ] : 204–206 For example, the equation x 2 + y 2 − 1 = 0 {\displaystyle x^{2}+y^{2}-1=0} of the unit circle defines y as an implicit function ...
The ideas involved in proving this second theorem are largely separate from those used in proving the first. The fundamental aspect of the proof is an implicit function theorem for isometric embeddings. The usual formulations of the implicit function theorem are inapplicable, for technical reasons related to the loss of regularity phenomena.
The implicit function theorem of more than two real variables deals with the continuity and differentiability of the function, as follows. [4] Let ϕ(x 1, x 2, …, x n) be a continuous function with continuous first order partial derivatives, and let ϕ evaluated at a point (a, b) = (a 1, a 2, …, a n, b) be zero:
In economics, comparative statics is the comparison of two different economic outcomes, before and after a change in some underlying exogenous parameter. [ 1 ] As a type of static analysis it compares two different equilibrium states, after the process of adjustment (if any).
For the case when the linear operator (,) is invertible, the implicit function theorem assures that there exists a solution () satisfying the equation ((),) = at least locally close to . In the opposite case, when the linear operator f x ( x , λ ) {\displaystyle f_{x}(x,\lambda )} is non-invertible, the Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction can be ...
Traditionally, comparative results in economics are obtained using the Implicit Function Theorem, an approach that requires the concavity and differentiability of the objective function as well as the interiority and uniqueness of the optimal solution. The methods of monotone comparative statics typically dispense with these assumptions.
So in the current standard terminology, the implicit function theorem is a theorem for deciding when an equation, which always defines a relation, actually (locally) defines a (smooth) function. It's not a theorem about "implicit functions", but a theorem about implicitly defined (actual) functions.