enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Timbs v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbs_v._Indiana

    Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether the excessive fines clause of the Constitution's Eighth Amendment applies to state and local governments.

  3. Motion to set aside judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_to_set_aside_judgment

    In law, a motion to set aside judgment is an application to overturn or set aside a court's judgment, verdict or other final ruling in a case. [1] [2] Such a motion is proposed by a party who is dissatisfied with the result of a case. Motions may be made at any time after entry of judgment, and in some circumstances years after the case has ...

  4. Your Guide to Filing a Small Estate Affidavit in Indiana - AOL

    www.aol.com/guide-filing-small-estate-affidavit...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. Inverse condemnation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_condemnation

    Inverse condemnation is a legal concept and cause of action used by property owners when a governmental entity takes an action which damages or decreases the value of private property without obtaining ownership of the property through the use of eminent domain. Thus, unlike the typical eminent domain case, the property owner is the plaintiff ...

  6. Lawsuit Claims Indiana Unconstitutionally Seizes Millions in ...

    www.aol.com/news/lawsuit-claims-indiana...

    The Institute for Justice says Indianapolis police and prosecutors are exploiting one of the biggest FedEx hubs in the U.S. to seize cash for alleged crimes they never explain.

  7. Civil Forfeiture Defendants Have the Right to a Jury Trial ...

    www.aol.com/news/civil-forfeiture-defendants...

    That prosecutors in the Hoosier State successfully denied people this due process is a reflection of how abusive civil forfeiture can be.

  8. Jackson v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Indiana

    Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that determined a U.S. state violated due process by involuntarily committing a criminal defendant for an indefinite period of time solely on the basis of his permanent incompetency to stand trial on the charges filed against him.

  9. Asset freezing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_freezing

    While it is not advisable to obtain such an order on purely strategic grounds, [13] asset freezing has a persuasive effect on settlement negotiations. [14] While a claimant obtaining an order can expect to face subsequent opposition in court from the defendant, the freezing order is generally considered to be the beginning of the end for the defendant as they will be unable to defend ...