Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The sequence of primes numbers contains arithmetic progressions of any length. This result was proven by Ben Green and Terence Tao in 2004 and is now known as the Green–Tao theorem. [3] See also Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. As of 2020, the longest known arithmetic progression of primes has length 27: [4]
Proof without words of the arithmetic progression formulas using a rotated copy of the blocks. An arithmetic progression or arithmetic sequence is a sequence of numbers such that the difference from any succeeding term to its preceding term remains constant throughout the sequence. The constant difference is called common difference of that ...
The two right triangles with leg and hypotenuse (7,13) and (13,17) have equal third sides of length .The square of this side, 120, is a congruum: it is the difference between consecutive values in the arithmetic progression of squares 7 2, 13 2, 17 2.
Recamán's sequence: 0, 1, 3, 6, 2, 7, 13, 20, 12, 21, 11, 22, 10, 23, 9, 24, 8, 25, 43, 62, ... "subtract if possible, otherwise add": a(0) = 0; for n > 0, a(n) = a(n − 1) − n if that number is positive and not already in the sequence, otherwise a(n) = a(n − 1) + n, whether or not that number is already in the sequence. A005132: Look-and ...
Linnik's theorem (1944) concerns the size of the smallest prime in a given arithmetic progression. Linnik proved that the progression a + nd (as n ranges through the positive integers) contains a prime of magnitude at most cd L for absolute constants c and L. Subsequent researchers have reduced L to 5.
The notion of an arithmetic progression makes sense in arbitrary -modules, but the construction of a topology on them relies on closure under intersection. Instead, the correct generalization builds a topology out of ideals of a Dedekind domain . [ 16 ]
Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions (infinite version): A subset of the natural numbers with positive upper density contains a 3-term arithmetic progression. An alternate, more qualitative, formulation of the theorem is concerned with the maximum size of a Salem–Spencer set which is a subset of [ N ] = { 1 , … , N } {\displaystyle [N ...
Linnik's theorem in analytic number theory answers a natural question after Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions.It asserts that there exist positive c and L such that, if we denote p(a,d) the least prime in the arithmetic progression