Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the Eighth Circuit, the court rejected Bucklew's facial challenge, as well as turned down his as-applied challenge as given but allowed Bucklew's case to be reheard if he could demonstrate that there was a feasible alternative, as per Baze. [9] Prior to the rehearing, the Supreme Court concluded in Glossip v.
First, it points to a difficult issue in competency evaluations. Although the standards for competency were set forth in Dusky v. United States, [5] much of the standard remains ambiguous and is not clearly defined. Only one common principle is clear in forensic evaluations, that forensic evaluators cannot reach a finding independent of the ...
The Competency Screening Test was developed by researchers at the Harvard Laboratory of Community Psychiatry in 1971. The test uses 22 fill in the blank style questions such as "If the jury finds me guilty, I will _____." Each answer is given a score of 0 (incompetent), 1 (uncertain competence), or 2 (competent).
Circuit Judge Jonathan A. Kobes: Sioux Falls, SD: 1974 2018–present — — Trump: 42 Senior Circuit Judge Pasco Bowman II: inactive: 1933 1983–2003 1998–1999 2003–present Reagan: 43 Senior Circuit Judge Roger Leland Wollman: inactive: 1934 1985–2018 1999–2002 2018–present Reagan: 45 Senior Circuit Judge C. Arlen Beam: inactive ...
Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning, 455 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2006), was a federal lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska and decided on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, 577 U.S. 442 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which held that representative evidence could be used to support the claims of the class. [1] The case arose as a class action lawsuit against Tyson ...
Ultimately, the Senate confirmed Bye to the seat on the Eighth Circuit in a 98-0 vote on February 24, 2000, and he received his commission on March 9, 2000. "The process involved...can be complex at best, certainly at times confusing and at times even frustrating," Bye told his supporters at his June 1, 2000, swearing-in.
The Eighth Circuit ruled in Dansby v. Norris that "Martinez" does not apply in states that allow ineffective assistance claims on direct appeal. The Fifth Circuit ruled in Gates v. Thaler that Martinez did not apply in Texas but the Supreme Court reversed in Trevino v. Thaler. [5]