Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
October 21, 2024: Esteras v. United States: 23-7483: Whether, even though Congress excluded from list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. October 21, 2024 (February 25, 2025) FCC v.
While the plaintiffs claimed to be uninvolved with the company and only small investors, Charles Moore actually served as a director for five years and they made additional investments totaling $150,000. [1] [2] The district court ruled for the government, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices frequently join multiple opinions in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
The U.S. Supreme Court issued several major decisions over the course of 2024.. Its rulings include those that have pushed back on the Biden administration's attempted change of Title IX ...
A written transcript of Wednesday’s oral arguments in Moore v. Harper is now publicly available on the U.S. Supreme Court’s website. The case, named partly for N.C. House Speaker Tim Moore, is ...
The Supreme Court’s decision left a lot of questions about how the North Carolina case impacts voters. We answer them here. US Supreme Court rules on Moore v.
Moore v. Harper, 600 U.S. 1 (2023), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that rejected the independent state legislature theory (ISL), a theory that asserts state legislatures have sole authority to establish election laws for federal elections within their respective states without judicial review by state courts, without presentment to state governors, and without ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us