enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Oposa v. Factoran - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oposa_v._Factoran

    Oposa v. Factoran, G.R. No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993), alternatively titled Minors Oposa v.Factoran or Minors Oposa, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines recognizing the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the Philippine legal system.

  3. Lists of landmark court decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_landmark_court...

    The Moorcock 14 P.D. 64 (1889): the concept of implied terms in contract law. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256: establishing the test for formation of a contract. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge and Co. Ltd. [1915] A.C. 847: confirming privity of contract: only a party to a contract can be sued on it. (This principle was ...

  4. List of major acts and legislation during the presidency of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_acts_and...

    An Act creating three (3) additional Shari'a Judicial Districts and twelve (12) Shari'a Circuit Courts therein, and appropriating funds therefor, amending for the purpose Articles 138, 147, and 150 of Presidential Decree No. 1083, otherwise known as the "Code of Muslim Personal Laws in the Philippines [84]", as amended, and the relevant ...

  5. People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Philippines...

    The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (R.A. 10175) was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012, becoming effective on October 3. [6] Among the actions criminalized by this law is "cyberlibel". [6] Six days after the law commenced, the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order to stop its implementation.

  6. Philippine legal codes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_legal_codes

    Judicial precedents of the Philippine Supreme Court were accepted as binding, a practice more attuned to common law jurisdictions. Eventually, the Philippine legal system emerged in such a way that while the practice of codification remained popular, the courts were not barred from invoking principles developed under the common law, [1] or from ...

  7. Supreme Court of the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the...

    – The Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America agree that all cases at law concerning the Government and people of the Philippines which, in accordance with section 7 (6) of the Independence Act of 1934, are pending before the Supreme Court of the United States of America at the date of the granting of the independence of ...

  8. Judiciary of the Philippines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_the_Philippines

    [4] [1]: 48 It is the appellate court for cases where "the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question", for the "legality of any tax" and related matters, where the "jurisdiction of any lower court is in ...

  9. Landmark Cases in Equity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_Cases_in_Equity

    Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (2006) by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell; Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort (2010) by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell; Landmark Cases in Family Law (2011) by Stephen Gilmore, Jonathan Herring and Rebecca Probert; Landmark Cases in Contract (2008) by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell; Landmark ...

  1. Related searches summary landmark judgement philippines law of service contract pdf example

    landmark court decisionslist of landmark decisions