enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

   Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

3. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

   However, many states have "stop and identify" laws that explicitly require a person detained under the conditions of Terry to identify themselves to police, and in some cases, to provide additional information. Before Hiibel, whether a detainee could be arrested and prosecuted for refusing to disclose their name was an unresolved issue.

4. United States v. Mendenhall - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_V._Mendenhall

   The justices in the majority opinion sought to follow the precedent established in Terry v. Ohio. In Terry, the court ruled that a police officer acted lawfully when detaining three men who appeared to be acting suspiciously. The man named in the title of the case, John W. Terry, was unable to walk away and was forced to submit to a search.

5. Terry Turner found guilty of manslaughter of Moroccan ... - AOL

   www.aol.com/terry-turner-found-guilty...

   Terry Turner, who was on trial this week for killing a 31-year-old Moroccan immigrant in October 2021, was found guilty of manslaughter on Thursday. ... The case made national headlines two years ...

6. List of Terry stop case law - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Terry_stop_case_law

   Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — stop and frisk for weapons OK for officer safety; Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968) — companion case to Terry. Peters v. New York (1968) — companion case to Terry contained in Sibron

7. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial...

   Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a statute requiring suspects to disclose their names during a valid Terry stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the statute first requires reasonable suspicion of criminal involvement, and does not violate the Fifth Amendment if there is no ...