Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), is a significant 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court.On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court considered the issue whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights extend to a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine.
Case name Citation Date decided Sykes v. United States: 564 U.S. 1: June 9, 2011 Talk Am., Inc. v. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. 564 U.S. 50: June 9, 2011 DePierre v. United States
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: 09-115: 2011-05-26 An Arizona law that sanctions employers who hire illegal immigrants is not preempted by federal immigration law. J.D.B. v. North Carolina: 09-11121: 2011-06-16 Age is relevant in Miranda cases. Bullcoming v. New Mexico: 09-10876 [dead link ] 2011-06-23
Michigan v. Bryant, 131 S. Ct. 1143 (2011) Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S. Ct. 2705 (2011) Williams v. Illinois, No. 10–8505 (June 18, 2012) Face-to-face confrontation
New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), the Court ruled that admitting a lab chemist's analysis into evidence, without having him testify, violated the Confrontation Clause. [ 15 ] [ 16 ] In Michigan v. Bryant , 562 U.S. 344 (2011), the Court ruled that the "primary purpose" of a shooting victim's statement as to who shot him, and the police's reason ...
The 2010 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 4, 2010, and concluded October 1, 2011. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.
King is the son of Bruce King, a three-time Governor of New Mexico, [1] and Alice M. King (née Martin), the former First Lady of New Mexico. [2] He attended New Mexico State University and obtained a bachelor's degree in chemistry in 1976. He received his Ph.D. in organic chemistry from University of Colorado, Boulder in 1980. He then attended ...
Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart: 563 U.S. 247 (2011) Eleventh Amendment • sovereign immunity • federal action by state agency against state officials for federal law violation • Supremacy Clause • Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 • Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act