enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criticism of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 16 January 2025. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...

  3. List of Wikipedia controversies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia...

    John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, no can edit the page, has led to concerns such as the quality of writing ...

  4. Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is...

    (The current list of proposed usability improvements includes 9 separate proposals concerning the text editor and the editing process, so this issue is not unknown in the Wikipedia community.) [1] There may be many people out there who would like to contribute but can't, perhaps especially women – Wikipedia is dominated by male editors.

  5. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...

  6. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    None of the answers from Wikipedia were determined factually inaccurate, while they found four inaccurate answers in MDR. But the researchers found 48 errors of omission in the Wikipedia entries, compared to 14 for MDR. The lead investigator concluded: "I think that these errors of omission can be just as dangerous [as inaccuracies]", and he ...

  7. Considered harmful - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful

    Considered harmful was already a journalistic cliché used in headlines, well before the Dijkstra article, as in, for example, the headline over a letter published in 1949 in The New York Times: "Rent Control Controversy / Enacting Now of Hasty Legislation Considered Harmful".

  8. Wikipedia:Wikipedia can be dangerous - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_can_be...

    Sometimes you have to be extra careful when saving a page, remember to check if it contains personal information and whatnot to identify you. If you do realize that you've added personal information to a page, contact an oversight and have it hidden from the public view.

  9. Wikipedia:Press coverage 2021 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Press_coverage_2021

    Stokel-Walker, Chris (March 1, 2021). "Wikipedia has seen a spike in people editing pages during the pandemic". New Scientist An analysis of 223 million edits to Wikipedia between 2018 and 2020 shows a 20 per cent increase in the number of changes made to pages on the English-language version between January and September 2020.