Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The court's temporary injunction did not affect the existing DACA. At the time, individuals were allowed to continue to come forward and request an initial grant of DACA or renewal of DACA under the guidelines established in 2012. [63] Regardless of the outcome of the preliminary injunction, legal opinions on the lawfulness of DACA are divided.
Wolf v. Vidal (known at lower courts as Batalla Vidal v.Nielsen), 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a case that was filed to challenge the Trump Administration's rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
A federal appeals court on Friday dealt the immigration program known as DACA a legal setback, keeping the program alive but teeing up a showdown at the Supreme Court. ... 2025 at 6:04 PM.
Hanen concluded that Democratic former President Barack Obama exceeded his powers when he created DACA in 2012 by executive action, bypassing Congress. Biden promises to appeal immigration ruling ...
The concept of the Immigration Examinations Fee Account, and the authority of USCIS to set a fee schedule to make sure that the fees cover the costs of providing the associated services, and are consistent with other aspects of United States federal law and regulations around fee-setting; some of these other laws and used to inform the USCIS' process of setting and updating fees: [1] [3]
The announced rule is expected to go into effect Nov. 1, which coincides with the Affordable Care Act’s open enrollment period for 2025 health insurance plans, allowing newly eligible DACA ...
On September 5, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that DACA would be phased out, with DACA recipients whose DACA status expiring on or before March 5, 2018, allowed to apply to renew their DACA status by October 5, 2017. [10] [11] [12] Later, President Trump indicated support for a law to protect DACA recipients. [13]
In 2015, Hanen ruled against an expansion of DACA and a partner program Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, and in 2021 he ruled that DACA itself was unlawful.