enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Jurisdictional error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdictional_Error

    Examples of jurisdictional errors include asking a ... An example is a civil court trying a criminal charge. ... the circumstances of a particular case may permit ...

  3. Craig v South Australia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_v_South_Australia

    Similarly, a failure by an inferior court to take into account some matter which it was, as a matter of law, required to take into account in determining a question within jurisdiction or reliance by such a court upon some irrelevant matter upon which it was, as a matter of law, not entitled to rely in determining such a question will not ...

  4. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Immigration...

    The High Court held that the reasons provided by the tribunal in each case was sufficient to satisfy s430. Additional commentary was provided by the court as to the meaning of 'jurisdictional error'. Regarding Jurisdictional error, the court wrote: [3]

  5. Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirk_v_Industrial...

    The High Court, in a unanimous decision, allowed Kirk's appeal. The Court held that the provisions in the Industrial Relations Act that restricted the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to review the commission's decision were constitutionally invalid.

  6. US Supreme Court split over government liability for credit ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-split-over...

    U.S. Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared divided over whether the federal government can be sued over errors related to consumer credit reports as they considered a case involving a ...

  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  8. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Immigration...

    The jurisdictional errors alleged before the Federal Magistrates Court were that The Tribunal did not consider the severe penalties the applicant will face as a homosexual in Pakistan. The Tribunal erred in using unreliable country information.

  9. Personal jurisdiction over international defendants in the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction_over...

    The effects doctrine is an offshoot of the territorial principle. Briefly, the effects doctrine says that if the effects of extraterritorial behavior or crimes adversely affect commerce or harm citizens within the United States, then jurisdiction in a U.S. court is permissible. The first case to establish the effects doctrine was United States v.