Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The harm that science could cause society was not known to the early scientists at the dawn of the industrial revolution and thus they "can be forgiven", [10] Kaczynski states, but that the harm caused by continuing scientific advance is now so apparent that to continue promoting it is "grossly irresponsible".
In this way, social shaping theorists conceive the relationship between technology and society as one of 'mutual shaping'. Some versions of this theory state that technology affects society by affordances, constraints, preconditions, and unintended consequences (Baym, 2015). Affordance is the idea that technology makes specific tasks easier in ...
The importance of stone tools, circa 2.5 million years ago, is considered fundamental in the human development in the hunting hypothesis. [citation needed]Primatologist, Richard Wrangham, theorizes that the control of fire by early humans and the associated development of cooking was the spark that radically changed human evolution. [2]
Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology is a book by Neil Postman published in 1992 that describes the development and characteristics of a "technopoly". He defines a technopoly as a society in which technology is deified, meaning “the culture seeks its authorisation in technology, finds its satisfactions in technology, and takes its orders from technology”.
The Development of a Society Can Never Be Subject to Rational Human Control; Why the Technological System Will Destroy Itself; How to Transform a Society: Errors to Avoid; Strategic Guidelines for an Anti-Tech Movement; Appendices: In Support of Chapter One; In Support of Chapter Two; Stay on Target; The Long-Term Outcome of Geo-Engineering
Sociotechnology (short for "social technology") is the study of processes on the intersection of society and technology. [1] Vojinović and Abbott define it as "the study of processes in which the social and the technical are indivisibly combined". [2]
Technological determinism is the idea that "features of technology [determine] its use and the role of a progressive society was to adapt to [and benefit from] technological change." [12] The alternative perspective would be social determinism which looks upon society being at fault for the "development and deployment" [13] of technologies.
As such, Winner neither succumbs to technological determinism nor social determinism. The source of a technology's politics is determined only by carefully examining its features and history. Although "The deterministic model of technology is widely propagated in society" (Sarah Miller), it has also been widely questioned by scholars.