Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The following journals used result-blind peer review or pre-accepted articles: The European Journal of Parapsychology, under Martin Johnson (who proposed a version of Registered Reports in 1974), [113] began accepting papers based on submitted designs and then publishing them, from 1976 to 1993, and published 25 RRs total [98]
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work . [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.
Such a paper, also called an article, will only be considered valid if it undergoes a process of peer review by one or more referees (who are academics in the same field) who check that the content of the paper is suitable for publication in the journal. A paper may undergo a series of reviews, revisions, and re-submissions before finally being ...
[5]: Q6, Q7 ResearchGate uses a crawler to find PDF versions of articles on the homepages of authors and publishers. [5]: Q6 These are then presented as if they had been uploaded to the web site by the author: [ 5 ] : Q7, Q8 the PDF will be displayed embedded in a frame, and only the button label "External Download" indicates that the file was ...
The article is not peer reviewed. All articles that are plausibly connected to the journal's subject are accepted – as long as the payment has been received. The main job of the journal's editor, once the author's payment has been received, is to post the article online.
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
And the article and its links provide a good start in figuring out who the person is. What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience? What else has the author published? Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works? This is a rough indicator of post-publication peer review and acceptance.
If it is important to discuss such findings in the Wikipedia article, the most reliable source available should be used. If a peer-reviewed article is published after a newspaper, blog, or other non-peer-reviewed publication of the research, both may be used, but in a conflict, the peer-reviewed publication is more authoritative and reliable.