Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Use of these templates is manual, authors may copy-and-paste the desired template into their text, and erase fields they do not need. Remember the {{double curly braces}}, and a vertical bar between fields. Introductory ("Beginner" and "Tutorial") pages such as the CITING SOURCES tab in the Wikipedia:Tutorial page do not necessarily cover ...
More than 100 pages use this file. The following list shows the first 100 pages that use this file only. A full list is available. User:Brightstarshines/sandbox; User:Cmbuff149/citing sources; User:Dr Ashton/course wizard/Timeline; User:Susan.nls/sandbox; User talk:Mpatnaik94; Wikipedia:GLAM/BBC's 100 Women/Events and Workshops/BBC Glasgow
Now you know how to add sources to an article, but which sources should you use? The word "source" in Wikipedia has three meanings: the work itself (for example, a document, article, paper, or book), the creator of the work (for example, the writer), and the publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press). All three can affect ...
This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources .
In-text attribution involves adding the source of a statement to the article text, such as Rawls argues that X. [5] This is done whenever a writer or speaker should be credited, such as with quotations, close paraphrasing, or statements of opinion or uncertain fact. The in-text attribution does not give full details of the source – this is ...
Copy and paste the text under "common usage" to use the template. Following each example is the resulting article text. For a list of tools that can help create some of the templates below, see: Wikipedia:Citation tools. Citations are commonly embedded in reference templates. For more information, see: Wikipedia:Footnotes.
Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.
a list of pre-approved sources that can always be used without regard for the ordinary rules of editing; a list of banned sources that can never be used or should be removed on sight; a list of biased or unbiased sources; a list of sources that are guaranteed to be correct regardless of context; a list of every source that has been discussed