Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The idea of insanity in English law dates from 1324, when the Statute de Praerogativa Regis allowed the King to take the lands of "idiots and lunatics." The early law used various words, including "idiot", "fool" and "sot" to refer to those who had been insane since birth, [2] and "lunatic" for those who had later become insane, or were insane with some lucid intervals. [3]
English: An Act to amend the form of the special verdict required by section 2 of the Trial of Lunatics Act 1883 and the procedure for determining whether an accused person is under a disability such as to constitute a bar to his being tried; to provide for an appeal against such a special verdict or a finding that the accused is under such a disability; to confer on the court of trial and the ...
Under section 5 of the United Kingdom's Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (as amended): [19] Where the sentence for the offence to which the finding relates is fixed by law (e.g. murder), the court must make a hospital order (see section 37 Mental Health Act 1983 ) with a restriction order limiting discharge and other rights (see section ...
The Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act 1991 (c. 25) The Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84) - also applies to Courts Martial elsewhere The Criminal Procedure (Right Of Reply) Act 1964 (c. 34)
Under the earlier Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964, determination of unfitness to plead led to an assumption that the accused had committed the act, without need for the prosecution to submit evidence, followed by automatic admission to hospital. In consequence fitness to plead was very rarely raised by defendants. [8]
If successful, he is likely to be detained under the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964, although judges have a wide discretion as to what to do. Use of insanity as a concept dates from 1324, and its criminal application was used until the late 16th century in an almost identical way.
Exclusive: Former president taking the stand would be ‘all downside with almost zero up,’ according to a criminal lawyer Trump would be committing ‘act of near-insanity’ if he testifies in ...
Under the earlier Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964, determination of unfitness to plead led to an assumption that the accused had committed the act, without need for the prosecution to submit evidence, followed by automatic admission to hospital. In consequence fitness to plead was very rarely raised by defendants. [1]