Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Aboriginal Sentencing Court; Coroner's Court of South Australia; District Court of South Australia; Environment, Resources and Development Court; Licensing Court of South Australia; Magistrates Court of South Australia; Supreme Court of South Australia; South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal; South Australian Employment Court
The District Court of South Australia is South Australia's principal trial court. It was established as a court of record by the District Court Act 1991 . Prior to that the Court had existed since 1969 under the Local and District Criminal Courts Act 1926 .
The Magistrates Court of South Australia is the lowest level court in the state of South Australia. The Magistrates Court, then known as the Court of Petty Sessions, was established in 1837, by the Court of Sessions Act 1837. [1] It has both original and appellate jurisdiction and hears matters specified in the Magistrates Court Act 1991 (SA). [2]
Fee-paying students are charged the full cost of their course, with no Commonwealth contribution. Some fee-paying students can obtain loans under the Higher Education Loan Programme, called FEE-HELP loans, to cover all or part of their fees. This is available to Australian citizens, New Zealand citizens and permanent humanitarian visa holders.
Primary school ranges from reception to grade 7 (5 to 12 years old), from around 2020 moving to grade 6, and high school covers ages 13–18 (moving to 12–18). High school students in Australia are eligible to complete the South Australian Certificate of Education (SACE), with many private schools running International Baccalaureate programs.
Secondary education at this time was only provided through fee paying private schools. [12] In 1908, Adelaide High School opened, the first free State high school in Australia. [13] The number of free high schools spread slowly and in 1915 only amounted to 6.2 secondary pupils per thousand people. However this grew to 73 per thousand 1969.
The appeals court ruling referenced the 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court case Wisconsin Property Taxpayers, Inc. v. Town of Buchanan in which the court ruled the Town of Buchanan’s transportation ...
2nd School Chaplins case: The legislation for funding for school chaplins was invalid as it extended beyond the scope of Parliament's power under the Constitution. CFMEU v BHP Coal Pty Ltd: 2014 French - held the employer did not act for a prohibited reason when it dismissed a union member who held up a scab sign during a union protest.