enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Martin v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Ohio

    Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228 (1987), is a criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of innocence requiring prosecution to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt only applies to elements of the offense, and does not extend to the defense of justification, whereby states could legislate a burden on the defense to prove justification.

  3. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Hunter's_Lessee

    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 304 (1816), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States decided on March 20, 1816. It was the first case to assert ultimate Supreme Court authority over state courts in civil matters of federal law.

  4. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._District_of...

    James Martin was a serial abuser of the court’s certiorari process; in the past decade following the court’s per curium opinion, Martin filed 45 petitions relating to being incarcerated for an unrelated offense, and the last 15 petitions for the prior two years were dismissed under the court’s rule 39.8. [4]

  5. Martin v. Boise - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Boise

    Martin v. Boise (full case name Robert Martin, Lawrence Lee Smith, Robert Anderson, Janet F. Bell, Pamela S. Hawkes, and Basil E. Humphrey v.City of Boise) was a 2018 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding anti-camping ordinances targeting homeless people, effectively overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024.

  6. Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_v._Martin...

    Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 542 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court landmark case in which the Court held that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer may not, in the absence of business necessity, refuse to hire women with pre-school-age children while hiring men with such children.

  7. Martin v. Herzog - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Herzog

    Martin (P) [a] appealed the order of the Appellate Division that reversed a judgment entered after jury trial that found Herzog (D) [b] negligent and P blameless. Martin (P) was driving his buggy on the night of August 21, 1915. P was killed in a collision between his buggy and Herzog's (D) car. It was dark when the accident occurred.

  8. Martin schools close investigation into racist photo on ...

    www.aol.com/news/martin-schools-close...

    The district issued a statement late Thursday, citing state and federal privacy laws for not releasing details of its investigation or any discipline imposed.

  9. Martin v. Hearst Corporation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Hearst_Corporation

    Lorraine Martin v. Hearst Corporation (2d Cir. 2015) was a defamation case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit protecting online news sources from having to remove or modify a story chronicling a person's arrest if that arrest is later erased from the record by the government using a criminal erasure statute.