Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd, [1] of 1981 is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the law of tendering for contracts. The case concerned the issue of whether the acceptance of a call for tenders for a construction job could constitute a binding contract. The Court held that indeed in many cases the submission of ...
Pages in category "Canadian contract case law" ... Fontaine et al. v Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2015 SKQB 220 ... R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern ...
Chandos Construction Ltd v Deloitte Restructuring Inc, 2020 SCC 25 is a landmark case of the Supreme Court of Canada concerning the position of the anti-deprivation rule within Canadian insolvency law. It held that, because of differences in Canadian law, the rule has wider application relative to the English rule applied by the UK Supreme ...
The two duties are equally relevant to both Québec's civil law and the other provinces' and territories' common law approaches to contract law, representing an attempt by the Supreme Court of Canada to extend the duties of good faith embedded in Québecois law to the jurisprudence of the country's common law jurisdictions. Additionally, in the ...
The terms Contract A and Contract B in Canadian contract law refer to a concept applied by the Canadian courts regarding the fair and equal treatment of bidders in a contract tendering process, for example to award a construction contract. Essentially this concept formalizes previously applied precedents and strengthens the protection afforded ...
Law v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1999] 1 SCR 497 March 25, 1999 section 15 MJB Enterprises Ltd v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd [1999] 1 SCR 619 Tendering contracts R v Monney [1999] 1 SCR 652 R v Beaulac [1999] 1 SCR 768 May 20, 1999 language rights M v H [1999] 2 SCR 3 May 20, 1999 rights of same-sex couples
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
However, Hrynew was not liable, as the Court of Appeal had held, because the requirements of inducing breach of contract and civil conspiracy were not made out. Good faith contractual performance is a general organising principle of contract law, which states a general requirement of justice. It can be given different weight in different ...