Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Royalty-free (RF) material subject to copyright or other intellectual property rights may be used without the need to pay royalties or license fees for each use, per each copy or volume sold or some time period of use or sales.
The author, or the licensor in case the author did a contractual transfer of rights, needs to have the exclusive rights on the work. If the work has already been published under a public license, it can be uploaded by any third party, once more on another platform, by using a compatible license, and making reference and attribution to the original license (e.g. by referring to the URL of the ...
Free Art license {} – Free Art license ; GNU's Not Unix! Note: The licenses in this section require reprinting the entire license text with any reuse of the image ...
The company passes more than 70% of its revenues to publishers in the form of royalty payments to rightholders, and another 30% is kept by the company as a fee for its services. [ 1 ] CCC is a primarily US-based rights broker for materials, including millions of in- and out-of-print books, journals, newspapers , magazines , movies, television ...
The Free Art License 1.3 has been declared compatible with CC BY-SA 4.0, [9] but incompatible with the GNU GPL. [2] It is recommended by the Free Software Foundation in the following terms: "We don't take the position that artistic or entertainment works must be free, but if you want to make one free, we recommend the Free Art License."
Free-software licenses that use "weak" copyleft include the GNU Lesser General Public License and the Mozilla Public License. The GNU General Public License is an example of a license implementing strong copyleft. An even stronger copyleft license is the AGPL, which requires the publishing of the source code for software as a service use cases.
Reproduction fees are charged by image collections for the right to reproduce images in publications. This is not the same as a copyright fee, but is charged separately, as is the cost of the provision of the image. It can be charged where an image is out of copyright, and reflects the possession of the image by a collection.
The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is not permitted as the only acceptable license where all of the following are true: [3] The content was licensed on or after 1 August 2021. The licensing date is considered, not the creation or upload date. The content is primarily a photograph, painting, drawing, audio or video.