enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Text formatting

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Do not put quotations in italics. Quotation marks (or block quoting) alone are sufficient and the correct ways to denote quotations. Italics should only be used if the quoted material would otherwise call for italics. Use italics within quotations to reproduce emphasis that exists in the source material or to indicate the use of non-English words.

  3. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles of works - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Titles in quotation marks that include (or in unusual cases consist of) something that requires italicization for some other reason than being a title, e.g. a genus and species name, or a non-English phrase, or the name of a larger work being referred to, also use the needed italicization, inside the quotation marks: "Ferromagnetic Material in ...

  4. Wikipedia:Quotations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quotations

    The quotation must be useful and aid understanding of the subject; irrelevant quotations should be removed. All quotations must be attributed to their sources. Unlike fair-use images, quotations are permitted on talk pages and project pages where they are useful for discussion but the requirements listed above should still be observed.

  5. Wikipedia:Manual of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style

    When quoting a quotation that itself contains a quotation, alternate between using double and single quotes for each quotation. See § For a quotation within a quotation for details. When quoting text from non-English languages, the outer punctuation should follow the Manual of Style for English quote marks .

  6. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/quotation and punctuation ...

    en.wikipedia.org/.../quotation_and_punctuation

    Since quotations are already marked by quotation marks or indentations, they need not be italicized. It is probably best to use the "double quotes" for most quotations, as they are easier to read on the screen. Use 'single quotes' for "quotations 'within' quotations," or to mark words for attribution.

  7. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 2

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    Alternative #4 (italics) has the additional disadvantage of being ambiguous without added quote marks (e.g. Medieval Criticism, Science and the World vs. Medieval Criticism, Science and the World). But the quotation marks in the first case would be superfluous if we're capitalizing, and they aren't creative works, but multi-party events/activities.

  8. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 1

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    This difficulty does not arise for double quotes, and this is one of the reasons the latter are recommended. For this reason, I often change single quotes to doubles except in the cases of nested quotations and (arguably) direct quotations using single quotes (though MOS:QUOTE appears to support changing these where possible).—

  9. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Text formatting/Archive 3

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    Could I suggest single quotes? Thus: Batista lifted his opponent into the air and slammed him to the ground using a move known as the 'Batista Bomb'. The quotes hold the phrase together. Saga City 15:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Quotation marks says we use double-quotes and not single-quotes. I think, if quotes are used, they ...

  1. Related searches quotations vs italics for quotes apa saja dalam penelitian menurut para

    wikipedia quotation stylewikipedia quotations
    wikipedia quotation examples