enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_term_per_curiam...

    The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] ...

  3. Kisela v. Hughes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kisela_v._Hughes&redirect=no

    2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes; Retrieved from " ...

  4. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT ...

    big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2018/...

    In sum, and in very general terms, when a person in Georgia registers to vote and submits a voter registration application, county election officials input the

  5. Harlow v. Fitzgerald - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlow_v._Fitzgerald

    Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court involving the doctrines of qualified immunity and absolute immunity.

  6. 10 Reasons Why Every American Woman Should Vote In November

    testkitchen.huffingtonpost.com/our-vote-counts

    For example, Donald Trump has vowed to appoint someone to the Supreme Court who would be willing to overturn landmark reproductive rights case Roe v. Wade. History tells us that matters like marriage equality, voting rights, abortion access and campaign finance are often adjudicated through the court system.

  7. Kingsley v. Hendrickson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsley_v._Hendrickson

    Kingsley v. Hendrickson , 576 U.S. 389 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held in a 5–4 decision that a pretrial detainee must prove only that force used by police is excessive according to an objective standard, not that a police officer was subjectively aware that the force used was unreasonable.

  8. Kirksey v. Kirksey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirksey_v._Kirksey

    Kirksey v. Kirksey , Ala. Sup. 8 Ala. 131 (1845), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama that held that a promise by a man, Issac Kirksey, to give his sister-in-law a house if she would move to his land was not a valid contract because it lacked bargained-for- consideration .

  9. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

    On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...