Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789; Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre [1997] AC 97; Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] AC 669; R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex p Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) [2000] 1 AC 119; R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary ...
The category of duty created in R. v. Evans seems to contravene the ruling in R. v. Rimmington, which holds that judges cannot extend common law offences to cover new forms of conduct. It is one thing to apply an existing doctrine to new facts, and another to apply it to conceptually different conduct such as assistance rather than perpetration."
Anthony David Bland (21 September 1970 – 3 March 1993) was a supporter of Liverpool injured in the Hillsborough disaster. He suffered severe brain damage that left him in a persistent vegetative state as a consequence of which the hospital, with the support of his parents, applied for a court order allowing him to " die with dignity ".
Case 1:10-cv-01067-RBW-DAR Document 212 Filed 12/14/12 Page 8 of 38 2 led the Project’s extensive and transparent approval process fully complied with all applicable
In law, an omission is a failure to act, which generally attracts different legal consequences from positive conduct. In the criminal law, an omission will constitute an actus reus and give rise to liability only when the law imposes a duty to act and the defendant is in breach of that duty.
More than 800 people have lost their lives in jail since July 13, 2015 but few details are publicly released. Huffington Post is compiling a database of every person who died until July 13, 2016 to shed light on how they passed.
R v Richards [1974] 1 QB 776 accomplice cannot be convicted of worse offence than the main actor even if he has the mens rea for one; Inchoate. Serious Crime Act 2007 ss 44-46; Criminal Law Act 1977 ss 1-5; Criminal Justice Act 1987 s 12 and 1988 s 39; Wai Yu-tsang v R [1992] 1 AC 269; R v Stracusa (1990) 90 Cr App R 340; R v Sadique [2013 ...
1. This action is brought by the United States against the City of Joliet (“Joliet” or “the City”) to enforce the provisions of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair