enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Toner refill - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toner_refill

   IBM/Lexmark Optra and similar; Epson EPL, NEC Silentwriter; Xerox and Sharp; Samsung and Lexmark Optra E; Brother; Kits are available to refill the 4 toner cartridges used by colour printers (cyan, magenta, yellow and black), or to fill a single cartridge. Kits include a reset chip where necessary. In all cases a toner that is at least ...

3. Ink cartridge - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ink_cartridge

   Two cartridges; one with black ink (a third-party HP 15 compatible cartridge), one with colored inks (an original type HP 17 tri-color cartridge) currently installed in an HP inkjet printer. An ink cartridge or inkjet cartridge is a component of an inkjet printer that contains ink to be deposited onto paper during printing. [1]

4. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexmark_International,_Inc...

   Lexmark is a large manufacturer of laser and inkjet printers, [4] and Static Control Components (SCC) is a company that makes "a wide range of technology products, including microchips that it sells to third-party companies for use in remanufactured toner cartridges."

5. Dynamic Cassette International - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Cassette_International

   Dynamic Cassette International (DCI) is an internationally recognised [1] Boston, Lincolnshire, UK based ink cartridge and laser toner manufacturing company, producing products under the Jet Tec brand name. DCI is the sole UK manufacturer of compatible ink cartridges.

6. Right to repair - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_repair

   To prevent refilling of empty ink ... rendering refills difficult or ... legal by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Impression Prods., Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l ...

7. Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_Cartridge...

   Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc., [1] 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) [2] was a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit which ruled that an End User License Agreement on a physical box can be binding on consumers who signal their acceptance of the license agreement by opening the box.