Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[3]: 5 So "it is my duty to do act A from the sense that it is my duty to do act A". [3]: 5 To avoid this problem, Ross suggests that moral goodness should be distinguished from moral rightness or moral obligation. [3]: 5 The moral value of an action depends on the motive but the motive is not relevant for whether the act is right or wrong.
Do not oppress as you do not like to be oppressed. Do good to others as you would like good to be done to you. Regard bad for yourself whatever you regard bad for others. Accept that (treatment) from others which you would like others to accept from you ... Do not say to others what you do not like to be said to you.
In this view, the denial of moral responsibility is the moral hankering to be able to assert that one has some fictitious right such as asserting PARENTAL rights instead of parent responsibility. Bruce Waller has argued, in Against Moral Responsibility (MIT Press), that moral responsibility "belongs with the ghosts and gods and that it cannot ...
Accept regret as part of the process. ... Meanwhile, satisficers are “more content going with their gut and doing what feels right to them, regardless of whether it’s considered ‘the best
Philosophers have sought to eliminate these contradictions by locating right and wrong in a single part of the decision-making process: for example, in the actions we take (e.g. Kant), in our character (e.g. Aristotle, virtue ethics) or in the consequences of our actions (e.g. Utilitarianism).
Often times the best way to do something is to do it right the first time. That statement holds especially true for Ford and its relaunch of its luxury Lincoln brand. As Ford hoped, the MKZ sedan ...
For example, someone who claims "something is morally right for me to do because the people in my culture think it is right" is both a moral relativist (because what is right and wrong depends on who is doing it), and an ethical subjectivist (because what is right and wrong is determined by mental states, i.e. what people think is right and wrong).
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek: δέον, 'obligation, duty' + λόγος, 'study') is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules and principles, rather than based on the consequences of the action. [1]