enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimshaw_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

    Ford contended that the "Exemplary damages" section of California's civil code [25] required an "evil motive," or an intent to injure the person harmed, for punitive damages, and argued absence of malice. The appellate court cited precedent that "malice" as used in California's "Exemplary damages" code included "not only a malicious intention ...

  3. Murder in California law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_California_law

    The law on the crime of murder in the U.S. state of California is defined by sections 187 through 191 of the California Penal Code. [1] The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that in the year 2020, the state had a murder rate near the median for the entire country. [2]

  4. Malice (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_(law)

    The malice standard decides whether press reports about a public figure can be considered defamation or libel. In the United States criminal law system, 'Malice aforethought' is a necessary element for conviction in many crimes. (For example, many jurisdictions see malice aforethought as an element needed to convict for first degree murder.)

  5. Felony murder and the death penalty in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_and_the...

    Most jurisdictions in the United States of America maintain the felony murder rule. [1] In essence, the felony murder rule states that when an offender kills (regardless of intent to kill) in the commission of a dangerous or enumerated crime (called a felony in some jurisdictions), the offender, and also the offender's accomplices or co-conspirators, may be found guilty of murder.

  6. Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnett_v._National...

    Carol Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. was a decision by the California Court of Appeal, which ruled that the "actual malice" required under California law for imposition of punitive damages is distinct from the "actual malice" required by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to be liable for defaming a "public figure", and that the National Enquirer is not a "newspaper" for the purposes of ...

  7. Malicious prosecution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution

    Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort.Like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution.

  8. California ranked nation’s fifth-worst 'judicial hellhole ...

    www.aol.com/california-ranked-nation-fifth-worst...

    (The Center Square) - California was ranked the nation’s fifth-worst “judicial hellhole” this year, improving from its third-place ranking last year by the American Tort Reform Foundation, a ...

  9. Felony murder rule in California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_rule_in...

    In March 2013, the California Supreme Court held, in People v. Wilkins (2013) 56 Cal.4th 333, as modified (May 1, 2013), a burglary is complete for purposes of the felony murder rule where death resulted from a negligent act committed while actively engaged in a burglary.