enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. McCulloch v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCulloch_v._Maryland

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 25 October 2024. 1819 United States Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland Supreme Court of the United States Argued February 21 – March 3, 1819 Decided March 6, 1819 Full case name James McCulloch v. The State of Maryland, John James [a] Citations 17 U.S. 316 (more) 4 Wheat. 316; 4 L. Ed. 579; 1819 ...

  3. James W. McCulloh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_W._McCulloh

    James W. McCulloh (1789–1861) was an American politician and cashier from Baltimore. [2] He is known for being a party in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case McCulloch v. . Maryland (1819), which held that Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause, and its valid exercise of those powers are supreme over the states.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 17

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    McCulloch v. Maryland , 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819) , is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the scope of the U.S. Congress's legislative power and how it relates to the powers of American state legislatures .

  5. Necessary and Proper Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_Proper_Clause

    The clause, as justification for the creation of a national bank, was put to the test in 1819 during McCulloch v. Maryland [ 6 ] in which Maryland had attempted to impede the operations of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a prohibitive tax on out-of-state banks, the Second Bank of the United States being the only one.

  6. Intergovernmental immunity (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental_immunity...

    The doctrine was established by the United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), [1] which ruled unanimously that states may not regulate property or operations of the federal government. In that case, Maryland state law subjected banks not chartered by the state to restrictions and taxes.

  7. Marshall Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Court

    The Supreme Court would again uphold this principle in Cohens v. Virginia (1821). [12] McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the court held that the state of Maryland had no power to tax a federal bank (the Second Bank of the United States) operating in Maryland.

  8. Article Six of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Six_of_the_United...

    McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) was a significant case in this regard. The state of Maryland had levied a tax on banks not chartered by the state; the tax applied, state judges ruled, to the Bank of the United States chartered by Congress in 1816. Marshall wrote that "the States have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden ...

  9. Enumerated powers (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enumerated_powers_(United...

    In 1819 the federal government opened a national bank in Baltimore, Maryland. In an effort to tax the bank out of business, the government of Maryland imposed a tax on the federal bank. James William McCulloch, a cashier at the bank, refused to pay the tax. Eventually the case was heard before the U.S. Supreme Court.