enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. A prototype Uber self-driving car in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in August 2016. The company argued in court that it could not be sued for a crash involving one of its drivers due to a forced ...

  3. Court blocks couple from suing Uber for crash because of the ...

    www.aol.com/news/court-blocks-couple-suing-uber...

    Lighter Side. Medicare. new

  4. Couple Injured in Uber Crash Blocked from Suing Due to Uber ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/couple-injured-uber-crash...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. Death of Elaine Herzberg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Elaine_Herzberg

    The county district attorney's office recused itself from the investigation, due to a prior joint partnership with Uber promoting their services as an alternative to driving under the influence of alcohol. [19] Accounts of the crash have been conflicting in terms of the speed limit at the place of the incident.

  6. Controversies surrounding Uber - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Uber

    Uber allegedly used this button at least 24 times, from spring 2015 until late 2016. [27] [28] The existence of the kill switch was confirmed in documents leaked in 2022. [29] When Uber offices were raided by police or regulatory agencies, the "kill switch" of which was not used until the very moment, was used to cut access to the data systems ...

  7. Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.

  8. Couple can't sue Uber after daughter clicked away trial ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/couple-cant-sue-uber-daughter...

    A couple, badly hurt in an Uber crash, can’t sue the company because their daughter once waived trial rights while using Uber Eats — a fateful click that prevents the family from suing the ...

  9. Uber Technologies Inc v Heller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uber_Technologies_Inc_v_Heller

    Uber Technologies Inc v Heller, 2020 SCC 16, is a 2020 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held 8–1 that an arbitration clause in a contract the plaintiff David Heller had signed with Uber was unconscionable, and hence unenforceable. As a result, it held that Heller's proposed class action lawsuit against Uber could go forward.