enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Commissioner v. Duberstein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioner_v._Duberstein

    The Court also rejected the premise that there is a bright line as to what constitutes a gift for taxation purposes. Id at 287. Instead, when determining whether something is a gift for taxation purposes, the critical consideration is the transferor's intention. Duberstein at 285-286 (citing Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34 (1937)). This ...

  3. Bogardus v. Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogardus_v._Commissioner

    Case history; Prior: Bogardus v. Helvering, 88 F.2d 646 (2d Cir. 1937); cert. granted, 301 U.S. 674 (1937).: Holding; That a distribution of money by a corporation, by a resolution passed by the board of directors and stockholders, to the company's past and present employees who had no ties with the corporation, in recognition of their past service was a non-taxable gift which the company ...

  4. Arrowsmith v. Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrowsmith_v._Commissioner

    The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court and held it to be a capital loss. [2] The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the Second Circuit and held that it was a capital loss. [1] Allowing the income from the liquidation to be taxed as a capital gain, while allowing loss payments out of that income to be deducted as an ordinary ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Pay Income Tax Then Litigate, Internal Revenue Act Dusky v. United States: 362 U.S. 402 (1960) standard for adjudicative competence: Commissioner v. Duberstein: 363 U.S. 278 (1960) definition of a 'gift' for taxation purposes Flemming v. Nestor: 363 U.S. 603 (1960) no property right in Social Security benefits Boynton v. Virginia: 364 U.S. 454 ...

  6. Supreme Court justices’ ethics questioned as they accept ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-justices-ethics...

    A former family law commissioner refused gifts from litigants while U.S. Supreme Court justices have accepted thousands of dollars in gifts. Where’s the ethics?: From our readers

  7. Astrue v. Capato - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrue_v._Capato

    Astrue v. Capato, 566 U.S. 541 (2012), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that children conceived after a parent's death are not entitled to Social Security Survivors benefits if the laws in the state that the parent's will was signed in forbid it. [1]

  8. My dad was 96 years old when he died at home — do I need to ...

    www.aol.com/finance/dad-96-years-old-died...

    The disturbing news of a death in a home can give some potential buyers the jitters, and eight states have laws that compel sellers to disclose a death on the property, per the analysis.

  9. US Supreme Court justices disclose Bali hotel stay, Beyoncé ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-justices...

    U.S. Supreme Court justices reported receiving gifts including a stay in a Bali hotel and tickets to a Beyoncé concert, as well as nearly $1.6 million in book advances and royalties in annual ...