enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Whitehead theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehead_theorem

    For instance, take X= S 2 × RP 3 and Y= RP 2 × S 3. Then X and Y have the same fundamental group, namely the cyclic group Z/2, and the same universal cover, namely S 2 × S 3; thus, they have isomorphic homotopy groups. On the other hand their homology groups are different (as can be seen from the Künneth formula); thus, X and Y are not ...

  3. CW complex - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CW_complex

    CW complexes satisfy the Whitehead theorem: a map between CW complexes is a homotopy equivalence if and only if it induces an isomorphism on all homotopy groups. A covering space of a CW complex is also a CW complex. [13] The product of two CW complexes can be made into a CW complex.

  4. Universal coefficient theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_coefficient_theorem

    This becomes straightforward in the absence of 2-torsion in the homology. Quite generally, the result indicates the relationship that holds between the Betti numbers b i of X and the Betti numbers b i,F with coefficients in a field F. These can differ, but only when the characteristic of F is a prime number p for which there is some p-torsion ...

  5. Simplicial homology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplicial_homology

    A key concept in defining simplicial homology is the notion of an orientation of a simplex. By definition, an orientation of a k-simplex is given by an ordering of the vertices, written as (v 0,...,v k), with the rule that two orderings define the same orientation if and only if they differ by an even permutation.

  6. Hopf invariant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopf_invariant

    It is a theorem, proved first by Frank Adams, and subsequently by Adams and Michael Atiyah with methods of topological K-theory, that these are the only maps with Hopf invariant 1. Whitehead integral formula

  7. Group cohomology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_cohomology

    A general paradigm in group theory is that a group G should be studied via its group representations.A slight generalization of those representations are the G-modules: a G-module is an abelian group M together with a group action of G on M, with every element of G acting as an automorphism of M.

  8. Whitehead torsion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehead_torsion

    Two pairs (X 1, A) and (X 2, A) are said to be equivalent, if there is a simple homotopy equivalence between X 1 and X 2 relative to A. The set of such equivalence classes form a group where the addition is given by taking union of X 1 and X 2 with common subspace A. This group is natural isomorphic to the Whitehead group Wh(A) of the CW-complex A.

  9. Tor functor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_functor

    Here are some of the basic properties and computations of Tor groups. [4]Tor R 0 (A, B) ≅ A ⊗ R B for any right R-module A and left R-module B.; Tor R i (A, B) = 0 for all i > 0 if either A or B is flat (for example, free) as an R-module.