Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This was a landmark case in the development of negligence law in Australia. [10] Whether a duty of care is owed for psychiatric, as opposed to physical, harm was discussed in the Australian case of Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002).
Law reports covering the decisions of Australian Courts are collections of decisions by particulars courts, subjects or jurisdictions. A widely used guide to case citation in Australia is the Australian Guide to Legal Citation , published jointly by the Melbourne University Law Review and the Melbourne Journal of International Law .
The catchwords give a summary classification of the matters dealt with in the case. The holdings are the grounds for decision. All citations, quotations and references in the text of a judgment are checked, and corrected if necessary, and the text conformed to the council's own style guide by the council's editorial staff.
Case opinions (4:1) There is no constitutional limit to granting money in a discriminatory manner (per Latham CJ, Rich, Starke & McTiernan JJ; Evatt J dissenting) Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) v W R Moran Pty Ltd (1939) 61 CLR 735 is a High Court of Australia case that deals with whether section 96 is limited by section 99 ...
Federated Amalgamated Government Railway & Tramway Service Association v NSW Rail Traffic Employees Association, known as the Railway Servants Case, [1] is an early High Court of Australia case that held that employees of State railways could not be part of an interstate industrial dispute under the conciliation and arbitration power, [2] applying the doctrine of "implied inter-governmental ...
The Court of Appeal operates pursuant to the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW). The Court hears appeals from a variety of courts and tribunals in New South Wales, in particular the Supreme Court, the Industrial Court, the Land and Environment Court, the District Court, the Dust Diseases Tribunal, the Workers Compensation Commission, and the Government and Related Employees Appeal Tribunal. [1]
New South Wales v Commonwealth may refer to a number of High Court of Australia cases: New South Wales v Commonwealth (1908) 7 CLR 179; New South Wales v Commonwealth (1915) 20 CLR 54, Wheat Case; New South Wales v Commonwealth (1932) 46 CLR 155, Garnishee Case No 1; New South Wales v Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 337, Seas and Submerged Lands Case
The inconsistency within the jurisprudence was not addressed until 1920, where the High Court overturned the Railway Servants' case, [4] and affirmed the Steel Rails case, [6] as a result of its ruling in the Engineers' case, [7] holding that the laws of the Commonwealth and the States have full operation within the subjects upon which they have power to legislate, subject to S. 109 in the ...