Ad
related to: god's arguments for religion and belief in lifercg.org has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This argument posits that individuals essentially engage in a life-defining gamble regarding the belief in the existence of God. Pascal contends that a rational person should adopt a lifestyle consistent with the existence of God and actively strive to believe in God.
The Argument from Evolution against God's existence is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the non-existence of God by using the theory of evolution. The argument is based on the idea that the theory of evolution provides a natural explanation for the diversity of life on Earth, and therefore, there is no need to invoke a divine ...
Critics of intelligent design creationism, for example, have accused proponents of using this basic type of argument. [19] God-of-the-gaps arguments have been discouraged by some theologians who assert that such arguments tend to relegate God to the leftovers of science: as scientific knowledge increases, the dominion of God decreases. [7] [8 ...
Thomas Aquinas summed up five main arguments as proofs for God's existence. Painting by Carlo Crivelli, 1476. The System of Nature (1770) argues that belief in God is based on fear, lack of understanding and anthropomorphism. The existence of God is a subject of debate in theology, philosophy of religion and popular culture. [29]
Kurt Gödel, the eminent mathematical logician, composed a formal argument for God's existence. Philosophical theism is the belief that the Supreme Being exists (or must exist) independent of the teaching or revelation of any particular religion . [ 1 ]
A person who is convinced of an evidential argument says, 'I believe because there is a good reason to do so.'" [4] He also states that the argument is different from C. S. Lewis’s argument from desire, which argues that there is an explanation of the source of the existential needs: “If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this ...
The argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of God. It holds that the best explanation for religious experiences is that they constitute genuine experience or perception of a divine reality. Various reasons have been offered for and against accepting this contention.
In this way, to acquire evidence for religious belief, we must first have believers who adopt such belief without sufficient evidence. Much later in life, in his "Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking" lectures, James also mentions the possibility that God's existence may actually depend upon our belief in his existence.
Ad
related to: god's arguments for religion and belief in lifercg.org has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month