Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Let be a natural number. For a base >, we define the sum of the factorials of the digits [5] [6] of , :, to be the following: = =!. where = ⌊ ⌋ + is the number of digits in the number in base , ! is the factorial of and
The factorial number system is a mixed radix numeral system: the i-th digit from the right has base i, which means that the digit must be strictly less than i, and that (taking into account the bases of the less significant digits) its value is to be multiplied by (i − 1)!
Every sequence of digits, in any base, is the sequence of initial digits of some factorial number in that base. [ 60 ] Another result on divisibility of factorials, Wilson's theorem , states that ( n − 1 ) ! + 1 {\displaystyle (n-1)!+1} is divisible by n {\displaystyle n} if and only if n {\displaystyle n} is a prime number . [ 52 ]
But if exact values for large factorials are desired, then special software is required, as in the pseudocode that follows, which implements the classic algorithm to calculate 1, 1×2, 1×2×3, 1×2×3×4, etc. the successive factorial numbers. constants: Limit = 1000 % Sufficient digits.
Graphs of functions commonly used in the analysis of algorithms, showing the number of operations versus input size for each function. The following tables list the computational complexity of various algorithms for common mathematical operations.
Prefix sums are trivial to compute in sequential models of computation, by using the formula y i = y i − 1 + x i to compute each output value in sequence order. However, despite their ease of computation, prefix sums are a useful primitive in certain algorithms such as counting sort, [1] [2] and they form the basis of the scan higher-order function in functional programming languages.
One special case of the coin problem is sometimes also referred to as the McNugget numbers. The McNuggets version of the coin problem was introduced by Henri Picciotto, who placed it as a puzzle in Games Magazine in 1987, [ 19 ] and included it in his algebra textbook co-authored with Anita Wah. [ 20 ]
A solution to EPART consists of two parts, each of which has n/2 elements with a sum of T. It corresponds to an optimal solution of both MSSP variants: two subsets with a sum of (n+1)T, which is the largest possible. Similarly, each optimal solution of MSSP corresponds to a solution to EPART.