Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
More than a decade after California passed the Human Right to Water Act, about 1 million residents still lack access to clean, safe, affordable water. ... People drinking water with arsenic or 1,2 ...
California water officials have estimated that the total costs of drinking water solutions for communities statewide amount to $11.5 billion over the next five years.
The water mingles with the groundwater for months before being pumped up and used for drinking water again. California's new rules would let — but not require — water agencies take wastewater ...
With California’s new limit, the risk of cancer is 500 times greater than the public health goal. One person out of 2,000 exposed for 70 years to drinking water with 10 parts per billion of chromium-6 may experience cancer, according to a state water staff report.
1986 protest against Proposition 65 California Proposition 65 warning before August 31, 2018 [2]. In 1986, political strategists including Tom Hayden and his wife, environmental activist Jane Fonda, thought that an initiative addressing toxic pollutants would bring more left leaning voters to the polls to help Democrat Tom Bradley in his gubernatorial race against incumbent Republican George ...
California has set a limit for the toxic heavy metal hexavalent chromium in drinking water. Advocates have called for a stricter limit, warning of health risks.
The idea of safe drinking water is the basis for the cities implementing their own clean water programs. For example, Oceanside Clean Water Program is set up to improve the water quality in their local creeks, rivers and oceans and to keep in accordance with the state and regional environmental regulations.
[15] These public water systems provide drinking water to more than 900,000 California residents. [16] A 2019 report found cancer-causing contaminants such as 1,2,3-TCP in roughly 495 public water systems in California. [17]