Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
At this time, it was noticed that a number of early manuscripts containing the Gospel of John lacked John 7:53–8:11 inclusive; and also that some manuscripts containing the verses marked them with critical signs, usually a lemniscus or asterisk. It was also noted that, in the lectionary of the Greek church, the Gospel-reading for Pentecost ...
Out of 23 Old Latin manuscripts of John 7-8, seventeen contain at least part of the pericope, and represent at least three transmission-streams in which it was included. The New King James Version includes the text with the explanation that the words from John 7:53 to 8:11 are bracketed by NU-Text "as not original.
John 8 is the eighth chapter in the Gospel of John in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It continues the account of Jesus' debate with the Pharisees after the Feast of Tabernacles, which began in the previous chapter. Verses 1-11, along with John 7:53, form a pericope which is
John 7:1 ου γαρ ειχεν εξουσιαν (for he did not have authority) – W 196 743 it a,b,ff 2 l,r 1 syr c Chrysostom ου γαρ ηθελεν (for he was not wanting) – All other mss. (rell) 𝔓 66 lacks John 7:53-8:11. John 7:53-8:11
[3] In common with both the other surviving early papyri of John's Gospel – P 45 (apparently), P 75, and most New Testament uncials – Papyrus 66 does not include the pericope of the adulteress (7:53-8:11), [4] demonstrating the absence of this passage in all the surviving early witnesses of the Gospel of John.
John 11 is the eleventh chapter of the Gospel of John in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It records the raising of Lazarus from the dead , a miracle of Jesus Christ , and the subsequent development of the chief priests' and Pharisees' plot against Jesus. [ 1 ]
The Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53 – 8:11) and the Short and Long Conclusions of Mark 16 (Mark 16:8–20)—offset from the main text in earlier editions—were removed. [55] The new revision was also released as part of an app called JW Library. [56]
A number of recensions of the Diatessaron are extant. The earliest, part of the Eastern family of recensions, is preserved in 4th century theologian Ephrem the Syrian's Commentary on Tatian's work, which itself is preserved in two versions: an Armenian translation preserved in two copies, and a copy of Ephrem's original Syriac text dated to the late 5th or early 6th century, which has been ...