Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
546 U.S. 1 Decided October 11, 2005. Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded. The Court of Appeals had ruled that the habeas corpus petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies by not arguing his federal claim of prosecutorial misconduct in state court, which it concluded only because the state court's opinion failed to discuss that argument.
Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 21-3886 (2023), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, on a challenge by Consumers' Research, a free-market advocacy organization, against the Federal Communications Commission's Universal Service Fund program.
Established on December 10, 1869 by the Judiciary Act of 1869 as a circuit judgeship for the Sixth Circuit Reassigned to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by the Judiciary Act of 1891: Jackson: TN: 1891–1893 Lurton: TN: 1893–1909 Knappen: MI: 1910–1924 Moorman: KY: 1925–1938 Hamilton: KY: 1938–1945 S ...
After the Fifth and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeal denied the administration's request to put a stay on the injunctions, the Department of Education turned to the Supreme Court, arguing that some ...
Tennessee v. Federal Communications Commission, 832 F.3d 597 (2016), was a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, [1] holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have the authority to preempt states from enforcing "anti-expansion" statutes that prohibit local municipal broadband networks from being expanded into nearby communities.
In March 2018, the Sixth Circuit reversed the decision, ruling that Title VII's "discrimination by sex" does include transgender persons. [8] The court also considered that the funeral home had failed to show how the Civil Rights Act burdened Rost from expressing his religious freedom. [9] Part of the Sixth's decision rested on the 1989 case ...
Only the Sixth Circuit expressly rejected this prevailing interpretation. [5] However, the prevailing view had been criticized as disregarding the text of the statute , [ 6 ] which says that "every civil action commenced against the United States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first ...
Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the 5-4 majority. Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court on March 21, 2012. In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court vacated the Sixth Circuit's opinion and remanded for further consideration. Relying on his opinion in Missouri v.