enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of video converters - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_converters

    The disadvantages of transcoding are that there is quality loss when transcoding between lossy compression formats, and that the process is highly CPU-intensive. This article compares video converters that have their own articles on Wikipedia.

  3. Data compression ratio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compression_ratio

    In contrast, lossy compression (e.g. JPEG for images, or MP3 and Opus for audio) can achieve much higher compression ratios at the cost of a decrease in quality, such as Bluetooth audio streaming, as visual or audio compression artifacts from loss of important information are introduced.

  4. LosslessCut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LosslessCut

    LosslessCut is a free, platform independent video editing software, which supports numerous audio, video and container formats. [4] [5]It is a graphical user interface, with MacOS, [6] Windows [7] and Linux [8] support, using the FFmpeg multimedia framework.

  5. Lossless compression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_compression

    Most lossless compression programs do two things in sequence: the first step generates a statistical model for the input data, and the second step uses this model to map input data to bit sequences in such a way that "probable" (i.e. frequently encountered) data will produce shorter output than "improbable" data.

  6. Comparison of video codecs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_codecs

    The quality the codec can achieve is heavily based on the compression format the codec uses. A codec is not a format, and there may be multiple codecs that implement the same compression specification – for example, MPEG-1 codecs typically do not achieve quality/size ratio comparable to codecs that implement the more modern H.264 specification.

  7. Lossy compression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression

    Video can be compressed immensely (e.g., 100:1) with little visible quality loss Audio can often be compressed at 10:1 with almost imperceptible loss of quality Still images are often lossily compressed at 10:1, as with audio, but the quality loss is more noticeable, especially on closer inspection.

  8. List of codecs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_codecs

    Original Sound Quality (OSQ) - Only used in WaveLab. FFmpeg (decoding only) Discontinued. Lossless Audio (LA) [5] – No update for 10+ years; Shorten (SHN) [6] – Officially discontinued. libshn; FFmpeg (decoding only) Lossless Predictive Audio Compression (LPAC) – Predecessor of MPEG-4 ALS; Lossless Transform Audio Compression (LTAC ...

  9. Video quality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_quality

    Classification of objective video quality models into Full-Reference, Reduced-Reference and No-Reference. No-reference image and video quality assessment methods. Objective models can be classified by the amount of information available about the original signal, the received signal, or whether there is a signal present at all: [5]