enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Section 230 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

    Section 230(c)(2) provides immunity from civil liabilities for information service providers that remove or restrict content from their services they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected", as long as they act "in good faith ...

  3. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Housing_Council_of...

    However, the court found that Roommates.com was immune under Section 230 of the CDA for the “additional comments” portion of the website. This case was the first to place a limit on the broad immunity that Section 230(c) gives to service providers that has been established under Zeran v. AOL (1997).

  4. Dart v. Craigslist, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dart_v._Craigslist,_Inc.

    Thomas Dart, Sheriff of Cook County v. Craigslist, Inc., 665 F. Supp. 2d 961 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 20, 2009), is a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in which the court held that Craigslist, as an Internet service provider, was immune from wrongs committed by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA).

  5. What is Section 230, the rule that made the modern internet?

    www.aol.com/news/section-230-rule-made-modern...

    Any change to Section 230 is likely to have ripple effects on online speech around the globe. “The rest of the world is cracking down on the internet even faster than the U.S.,” Goldman said.

  6. The Worst Section 230 Bill Yet - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/worst-section-230-bill-yet...

    New bipartisan legislation would sunset Section 230 after next year.

  7. EXPLAINER-What is Section 230 - and can Trump change it? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/explainer-section-230-trump...

    U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to order a review of a federal law known as Section 230, which protects internet companies like Facebook, Twitter and Alphabet's Google from being ...

  8. Zeran v. America Online, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeran_v._America_Online,_Inc.

    Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), [2] is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit determined the immunity of Internet service providers for wrongs committed by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

  9. Supreme Court dismisses challenges to Section 230, the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-dismisses...

    In a victory for social media sites, the justices declined Thursday to rule on a challenge to Section 230, which protects websites from being sued over its users' posts.