Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fidelity is symmetric in its arguments, i.e. F (ρ,σ) = F (σ,ρ). Note that this is not obvious from the original definition. F (ρ,σ) lies in [0,1], by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. F (ρ,σ) = 1 if and only if ρ = σ, since Ψ ρ = Ψ σ implies ρ = σ. So we can see that fidelity behaves almost like a metric.
In elementary algebra, the binomial theorem (or binomial expansion) describes the algebraic expansion of powers of a binomial.According to the theorem, the power (+) expands into a polynomial with terms of the form , where the exponents and are nonnegative integers satisfying + = and the coefficient of each term is a specific positive integer ...
The approach is based on the relation between the fidelity and the quantum Fisher information and that the fidelity can be computed based on semidefinite programming. For systems in thermal equibirum, the quantum Fisher information can be obtained from the dynamic susceptibility. [29]
The question of when this happens is rather subtle: for example, for the localization of k[x, y, z]/(x 2 + y 3 + z 5) at the prime ideal (x, y, z), both the local ring and its completion are UFDs, but in the apparently similar example of the localization of k[x, y, z]/(x 2 + y 3 + z 7) at the prime ideal (x, y, z) the local ring is a UFD but ...
The first step of Fermat's proof is to factor the left-hand side [30] (x 2 + y 2)(x 2 − y 2) = z 2. Since x and y are coprime (this can be assumed because otherwise the factors could be cancelled), the greatest common divisor of x 2 + y 2 and x 2 − y 2 is either 2 (case A) or 1 (case B). The theorem is proven separately for these two cases.
The x-axis of a mass spectrum represents a relationship between the mass of a given ion and the number of elementary charges that it carries. This is written as the IUPAC standard m/z to denote the quantity formed by dividing the mass of an ion (in daltons) by the dalton unit and by its charge number (positive absolute value).
Two ways of making this expansion can be found in the literature: The first is a Taylor series in the Cartesian coordinates x, y, and z, while the second is in terms of spherical harmonics which depend on spherical polar coordinates. The Cartesian approach has the advantage that no prior knowledge of Legendre functions, spherical harmonics, etc ...
The canonical desingularization of the ideal with these generators would blow up the center C 0 given by x=y=z=w=0. The transform of the ideal in the x-chart if generated by x-y 2 and y 2 (y 2 +z 2-w 3). The next center of blowing up C 1 is given by x=y=0. However, the strict transform of X is X 1, which is generated by x-y 2 and y 2 +z 2-w 3.