enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lancet MMR autism fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_MMR_autism_fraud

    The Sunday Times continued the investigation, and on 8 February 2009, Brian Deer reported that Wakefield had "fixed" results and "manipulated" patient data in the Lancet, creating the appearance of a link with autism. [3]

  3. The Lancet - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lancet

    The Lancet is a weekly peer-reviewed ... The studies attracted criticism from some patients and ... in order to learn what the trial's results would have been under ...

  4. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Subarachnoid...

    The study began in 1994 with the first results being published in The Lancet in 2002, and the 10-year data were published again in The Lancet in early September 2005. A total of 2,143 study participants were mostly drawn from U.K. hospitals with the rest drawn from North American and European hospitals.

  5. STAMPEDE (clinical trial) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STAMPEDE_(clinical_trial)

    The overall conclusion was that "standard of care should be updated to include docetaxel chemotherapy in suitable patients with metastatic disease, and docetaxel may be considered for men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer with or without radiotherapy". [5] Parker, James & Brawley 2018 reported on radiotherapy. For patients with a ...

  6. Global Burden of Disease Study - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Burden_of_Disease_Study

    Seven Billion Patients by Jeremey N. Smith. [20] GBD 2019 was published in The Lancet in October 2020. [21] GBD 2021 was published in The Lancet in February to May 2024, including an impact assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as projections by 2050. [22] Fact sheets are provided for all topics. [23]

  7. Andrew Wakefield - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield

    In May 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology retracted a paper of Wakefield's that used data from the 12 patients of the article in The Lancet. [98] On 5 January 2011, British Medical Journal editors recommended that Wakefield's other publications be scrutinized and retracted if need be. [37]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com/?icid=aol.com-nav

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Bleeding time - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_time

    With the Duke's method, the patient is pricked with a special needle or lancet, preferably on the earlobe [8] or fingertip, after having been swabbed with alcohol. The prick is about 3–4 mm deep. The patient then wipes the blood every 30 seconds with a filter paper. The test ceases when bleeding ceases. The usual time is about 2–5 minutes.