enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Corroborating evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroborating_evidence

    There can also be corroborating evidence related to a certain source, such as what makes an author think a certain way due to the evidence that was supplied by witnesses or objects. [ 1 ] Another type of corroborating evidence comes from using the Baconian method , i.e., the method of agreement , method of difference , and method of concomitant ...

  3. Corroborate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Corroborate&redirect=no

    This page was last edited on 1 April 2006, at 09:21 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may ...

  4. Grammatical modifier - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_modifier

    Another type of modifier in some languages, including English, is the noun adjunct, which is a noun modifying another noun (or occasionally another part of speech). An example is land in the phrase land mines given above. Examples of the above types of modifiers, in English, are given below. It was [a nice house].

  5. Corroboration in Scots law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroboration_in_Scots_law

    The importance of corroboration is unique to Scots criminal law. [1] A long-standing feature of Scots law, the requirement for corroborating evidence means at least two independent sources of evidence are required in support of each crucial fact before an accused can be convicted of a crime. [2]

  6. Evidentiality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidentiality

    come- PAST gel-di come-PAST "came" gel-miş come- INDIR. PAST gel-miş come- INDIR.PAST "obviously came, came (as far as understood)" In the word geldi, the unmarked suffix -di indicates past tense. In the second word gelmiş, the suffix -miş also indicates past tense but indirectly. It may be translated into English with the added phrases 'obviously', 'apparently' or 'as far as I understand ...

  7. Talk:Corroborating evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Corroborating_evidence

    But, the organization of this topic (and others) lists a series of often obscure (to the lay reader) terms that require concise definitions to be useful. That does not make Wikipedia a dictionary because (eventually), for example, one could read a piece on "corroborating evidence" as part of a larger article on the history and use of evidence.

  8. Hypercorrection - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercorrection

    In sociolinguistics, hypercorrection is the nonstandard use of language that results from the overapplication of a perceived rule of language-usage prescription.A speaker or writer who produces a hypercorrection generally believes through a misunderstanding of such rules that the form or phrase they use is more "correct", standard, or otherwise preferable, often combined with a desire to ...

  9. Falsifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

    In statistical language, the potential falsifier that can be statistically accepted (not rejected to say it more correctly) is typically the null hypothesis, as understood even in popular accounts on falsifiability.