Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Judge, Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2012–2015) Sallie Updyke Mundy June 29, 1962 (age 62) in Elmira, New York: July 21, 2016 [note 1] Republican: First term 2027 June 29, 2037 Judge, Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2010–2016) P. Kevin Brobson November 26, 1970 (age 54) in Mountoursville, Pennsylvania: January 3, 2022 Republican
Health experts Wednesday praised bills that would nix the religion exemption for vaccinations as they warned about the rise of preventable diseases. State lawmakers target religious exemption for ...
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge to a 2021 Connecticut law that eliminated the state’s longstanding religious exemption from childhood immunization requirements for schools ...
This collision of vaccine mandates, religion and personal choice could leave the issue up to individual employers — whether it be government agencies, hospitals or private businesses — to ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court consists of seven justices, each elected to ten year terms. Supreme Court judicial candidates may run on party tickets. The justice with the longest continuous service on the court automatically becomes Chief Justice. Justices must step down from the Supreme Court when they reach the age of 75 (at the end of the ...
The Court, in a 6-2 opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the "plaintiffs design defect claims [were] expressly preempted by the Vaccine Act." Thus, the court affirmed laws that vaccine manufacturers are not liable for vaccine-induced injury or death if they are "accompanied by proper directions and warnings." [2]
The Supreme Court turned away two Covid-related appeals from an anti-vaccine group founded by independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The opinion of the district court judge denying preliminary injunction was 101 pages, unusually lengthy for that stage of the case. Judge Leichty addressed at length the question of whether the 1905 United States Supreme Court case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts was still the appropriate legal precedent to follow, concluding that it was.