enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Uttar_Pradesh_v...

    Raj Narain (1975 AIR 865, 1975 SCR (3) 333) was a 1975 case heard by the Allahabad High Court that found the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices. The ruling on the case that had been filed by the defeated opposition candidate, Raj Narain , Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha invalidated Gandhi's win and barred her from ...

  3. Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahabad_High_Court

    Uttar Pradesh has at least 9 times more pending cases than any other state. Allahabad High Court as of 2022, has 9.33 lakh cases pending in the fast-track courts of Uttar Pradesh, followed by over 1.04 lakh cases in Maharashtra, 1.02 lakh cases in Tamil Nadu, 71,260 cases in West Bengal and 12,538 cases in Telangana.

  4. Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultana_Mirza_v._State_of...

    Sultana Mirza & Anr. v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2020), a decision of the Allahabad High Court, established that the Constitutional Court bears the responsibility of overseeing and upholding both constitutional morality and the rights of citizens, particularly when these rights are endangered solely due to their sexual orientation.

  5. Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayodhya_dispute

    The Allahabad high court bench, comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, began hearing the case in April 2002, which it would complete by 2010. [102] In 2003, the Archaeological Survey of India began a court-ordered survey to determine if a temple to Lord Rama existed on the site; the survey said there was evidence of a ...

  6. Poonam Rani v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poonam_Rani_v._State_of...

    Moreover, the Bench reiterated the precedent set by the Allahabad High Court in the case of Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020). This Court, being a Constitutional Court, is duty bound to monitor and observe Constitutional morality, as well as the rights of citizens that are under threat only on account of sexual orientation.

  7. 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Supreme_Court_verdict...

    The Allahabad High Court bench began hearing the case in 2002, which was completed in 2010. After the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to defer the High Court verdict, [ 9 ] on 30 September 2010, the High Court of Allahabad, the three-member bench comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, ruled that the disputed ...

  8. Category:Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Allahabad_High_Court

    Pages in category "Allahabad High Court" The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ... Mobile view ...

  9. Jagmohanlal Sinha - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagmohanlal_Sinha

    Notably, he held the position of District & Sessions Judge Joint Secretary in the Law Department of the Uttar Pradesh Government. On January 3, 1970, he was appointed as an Additional Judge of the Allahabad High Court, and later, on August 25, 1972, he became a Permanent Judge. [3]