enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc.

    Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of records that revealed the prescribing practices of individual doctors violated the First Amendment.

  3. Massachusetts v. Purdue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Purdue

    Massachusetts v. Purdue is a lawsuit filed on August 14, 2018, suing the Stamford, Connecticut-based company Purdue Pharma LP, which created and manufactures OxyContin, "one of the most widely used and prescribed opioid drugs on the market", and Purdue's owners, the Sacklers [1] accusing them of "widespread fraud and deception in the marketing of opioids, and contributing to the opioid crisis ...

  4. List of off-label promotion pharmaceutical settlements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_off-label...

    The following are settlements reached with US authorities against pharmaceutical companies to resolve allegations of "off-label" promotion of drugs. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, it is illegal for pharmaceutical companies to promote their products for uses not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and corporations that market drugs for off-label indications may ...

  5. Medical jurisprudence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_jurisprudence

    Physicians have a duty to act in their patients best interest and can be charged in a court of law if they fail to do so. On the other hand, a physician may be required to act in the interest of third parties if his patient is a danger to others. Failure to do so may lead to legal action against the physician. Medical jurisprudence includes:

  6. America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker - The Huffington Post

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    The Janssen doctors and statisticians now had more complete results from the long-term study of children and adolescents using Risperdal. They confirmed that the claim on the current label that gynecomastia was “rare” (meaning that it occurred in fewer than one-tenth of 1 percent of patients) was understated by a factor of more than 50.

  7. Canterbury v. Spence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canterbury_v._Spence

    Canterbury v. Spence (464 F.2d. 772, 782 D.C. Cir. 1972) was a landmark federal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that significantly reshaped malpractice law in the United States. [1] [2] It established the idea of "informed consent" to medical procedures.

  8. AstraZeneca plc v Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AstraZeneca_plc_v_Commission

    AstraZeneca plc misrepresented the dates of invention of a stomach ulcer drug, omeprazole (its brand was Losec), to national patent offices and courts.It also deregistered a capsule version, to get longer patent protection, and thus prevent other companies producing generic versions of the drug.

  9. King v. Burwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_v._Burwell

    The government argues that the law intends for federal exchanges to be treated identically to state exchanges (and therefore qualifying individuals are entitled to subsidies whether or not their state has set up an exchange), or, in the alternative, if the law were ambiguous, that the regulation at issue was a permissible interpretation of the law.