Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
People of the Philippines v. Santos, Ressa and Rappler (R-MNL-19-01141-CR), also known as the Maria Ressa cyberlibel case, is a high-profile criminal case in the Philippines, lodged against Maria Ressa, co-owner and CEO of Rappler Inc.. [2] Accused of cyberlibel, Ressa was found guilty by a Manila Regional Trial Court on June 15, 2020. [3] [4]: 36
An award-winning journalist who has aggressively covered Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s administration is bracing for a verdict in a libel case and says she sees the upcoming decision as ...
The officials of the Philippines National Bureau of Investigation fulfilled this warrant filed under the charge of cyber libel. The "cyber libel" law was passed after the article was originally published, so the charge was based on the technicality that fixing a typo might be considered "republishing". [79] The arrest was live-streamed by many ...
From July 2016 to April 2021, there were 37 cases of libel and oral defamation recorded. Eighteen of these were online libel, while 8 of the 37 cases also led to arrests of journalists. [10] There was a rise in libel and cyber libel cases in the country in 2020, according to the NUJP. [27]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Philippine police backed by commandos staged a massive raid on Tuesday and said they rescued more than 2,700 workers from China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia and more than a dozen other ...
On May 10, 2024, Sharon Cuneta and Francis Pangilinan filed five counts of cyberlibel case with the Makati Prosecutors Office against Fermin for an alleged defamation centering on the couple's "personal and family affairs.” [8] In Cristy FerMinute, Fermin replied thereto - “Territorial po 'yan, 'cyber libel' -- it comes with the territory ...
The case originated from a petition of an individual, convicted in a libel case in connection with a Facebook post made in 2011, who argued that such remarks should not be punishable with the case. Since the post was made a year prior to the passage of the law, the court decided that the accused cannot be charged of libel, emphasizing that ...