Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[3] [4] She comes to this definition by combining Samuel P. Huntington's definition that it "is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of society, in its political institutions, social structure, leadership, and government activities and policies" [5] and Vladimir Lenin's, which is that revolutions ...
Moments which seem revolutionary on the surface may end up reinforcing established institutions. Likewise, evidently small changes may lead to revolutionary consequences in the long term. Thus the clarity of the distinction between revolution and reform is more conceptual than empirical. A conservative is someone who generally opposes such changes.
In the praxis of revolutionary political science the vanguard party was composed of professional revolutionaries, first effected by the Bolshevik Party in the Russian Revolution of 1917. Lenin, the first leader of the Bolsheviks, coined the term vanguard party, and argued that such a party was necessary in order to provide the practical and ...
Transformative social change is a philosophical, practical and strategic process to affect revolutionary change within society, i.e., social transformation.It is effectively a systems approach applied to broad-based social change and social justice efforts to catalyze sociocultural, socioeconomic and political revolution.
Sun Yat-sen, leader of the Chinese Xinhai Revolution in 1911. Khana Ratsadon, a group of military officers and civil officials, who staged the Siamese Revolution of 1932. Political and socioeconomic revolutions have been studied in many social sciences, particularly sociology, political science and history. [25] Scholars of revolution ...
[P]ower legitimized on the basis of a leader's exceptional personal qualities or the demonstration of extraordinary insight and accomplishment, which inspire loyalty and obedience from followers. [13] Leadership is the power to diffuse a positive energy and a sense of greatness. As such, it rests almost entirely on the leader. The absence of ...
Charles Tilly defines it as "a social movement advancing exclusive competing claims to control of the state, or some segment of it". [1] Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper define it more simply (and consistently with other works [2] [need quotation to verify]) as "a social movement that seeks, as minimum, to overthrow the government or state".
Reformism as a political tendency and hypothesis of social change grew out of opposition to revolutionary socialism, which contends that revolutionary upheaval is a necessary precondition for the structural changes necessary to transform a capitalist system into a qualitatively different socialist system.